Findings and exploration of Intel Optane 900p Under ESXI

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

marcoi

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2013
1,533
289
83
Gotha Florida
Yes, something is not quite right, with the CrystalDisk 4K Q32T1 results for the 900P on bare metal. I've seen Samsung 960 PRO M.2 NVMe with Samsung NVMe driver, hit around 360 MB/s on the 4K Q32T1 test.

Is Win 10 and CrystalDisk installed on separate boot drive?
Win 10 and CDM were on separate drive from 900p. The 900p was bare.
 

marcoi

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2013
1,533
289
83
Gotha Florida
Side note. I flipped the server back to esxi host. I wanted to re test freenas with para virtual control, but when I added it and drives they don't show up. Anyone know if there is support for paravirtual under freenas?
 

Rand__

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2014
6,634
1,767
113
@marcoi Do you need some alternate data points?
Still waiting for a freenas fix so I can spin up a win vm to test if you need it?
 

Rand__

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2014
6,634
1,767
113
Your Box/OS has a 4k issue - benchmark is done in a minute then you see for yourself

Edit: Here you go, Win2012 R2

cdm_900p.PNG
cdm_900p_2.PNG
 

Rand__

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2014
6,634
1,767
113
2nd line is not directly comparable due to different settings;)

Else the ESX one is not too bad
 

marcoi

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2013
1,533
289
83
Gotha Florida
So i put the card into another system ( X10SL7-F based) and i got way better results on bare metal w10 install with no patching and intel drivers installed.

Next is testing dell again but a different slot.
upload_2017-11-10_22-6-28.png
 

vrod

Active Member
Jan 18, 2015
241
43
28
31
I did try the nvme controller but it seemed to have worst results then standard.
That's weird... I've had better performance with it. You also installed the Intel ESXi NVMe driver right?
 

marcoi

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2013
1,533
289
83
Gotha Florida
That's weird... I've had better performance with it. You also installed the Intel ESXi NVMe driver right?
I install the intel nvme driver in the vm host not at ESXI host. Is that what you meant?
Can you post some of your results with the nvme controller?
 

vrod

Active Member
Jan 18, 2015
241
43
28
31
If you are benchmarking through virtual disks (vm residing on vmfs with nvme backend, then you should install the driver in esxi. If using pasthrough, then of course in vm (windows)
 

marcoi

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2013
1,533
289
83
Gotha Florida
I downloaded and installed the driver. I need to reboot the host still. I dont know how much this will improve if at all. I think my host server dell r720 has some kind of issue with the intel 900p where it is limiting the potential of the drive. when i tried the 900p in another server i got the higher benchmarks. I tried the 900p in the dell in three different slots, with all the other cards removed, bare metal install of windows, and nada it always gives the same results.

so i think there might be a bios issue or something.
 

marcoi

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2013
1,533
289
83
Gotha Florida
So this is dell r720 server with intel driver installed for esxi and running para-virtual controller in w10 vm. Notice i had to get T4 to get these numbers.
upload_2017-11-12_23-56-58.png

So far this has giving me the best numbers. Now i jst need to get para-virtual working under freenas.