I'm wondering how something like a Xeon 6130H system off Ebay compares against 1st gen EPYC processors like 7551P. The Xeon motherboard/CPU is priced slightly more than the EPYC system. Which one would be a better fit for running VMs?
Thanks, that is very helpful. Licensing isn't an issue for me. Usecase is for homelab use and I will be running Proxmox. Guests will be Linux or FreeBSD.7551P = 32 cores but only 3ghz max boost
6130H = 16 cores but 3.7ghz boost clock
If it’s a lot of VM’s or highly threaded workload then the AMD but the Intel is really not a bad cpu and lower tdp so possibly easier to cool.
Maybe licensing is a topic for you also ? (Let’s say windows with the 16-core base limit)
I know I don’t run any actual heavy workload but other than people who are practicing some data silence or some AI/ML I am not convinced anybody would need beyond 16cpu, memory maybe more so.Thanks, that is very helpful. Licensing isn't an issue for me. Usecase is for homelab use and I will be running Proxmox. Guests will be Linux or FreeBSD.
Thank you, that makes a lot of sense.I know I don’t run any actual heavy workload but other than people who are practicing some data silence or some AI/ML I am not convinced anybody would need beyond 16cpu, memory maybe more so.
Probably I don’t care as much as some hanging out here because I get to play with the big stuff at work during the day.
Either way probably pick the cheapest or toss a coin. Until 16-core busy I would assume the Intel wins, anything beyond that the AMD will no doubt win.
(Not I didn’t have any other advice since it seems you don’t specifically need lathe cache or AVX512 or anything really interesting)
not me personaly but i heared about. but there are many BAD ES arround that don't support dual socket.Hi guys, anyone had a pair of ql1m working together?
[root@robotboy:~] vim-cmd hostsvc/hostsummary
(vim.host.Summary) {
host = 'vim.HostSystem:ha-host',
hardware = (vim.host.Summary.HardwareSummary) {
vendor = "Supermicro",
model = "Super Server",
uuid = "00000000-0000-0000-0000-ac1f6b48ea2a",
otherIdentifyingInfo = (vim.host.SystemIdentificationInfo) [
(vim.host.SystemIdentificationInfo) {
identifierValue = "Default string",
identifierType = (vim.ElementDescription) {
label = "Asset Tag",
summary = "Asset tag of the system",
key = "AssetTag"
}
},
(vim.host.SystemIdentificationInfo) {
identifierValue = "0123456789",
identifierType = (vim.ElementDescription) {
label = "Service tag",
summary = "Service tag of the system",
key = "ServiceTag"
}
},
(vim.host.SystemIdentificationInfo) {
identifierValue = "0123456789",
identifierType = (vim.ElementDescription) {
label = "Enclosure serial number tag",
summary = "Enclosure serial number tag of the system",
key = "EnclosureSerialNumberTag"
}
},
(vim.host.SystemIdentificationInfo) {
identifierValue = "0123456789",
identifierType = (vim.ElementDescription) {
label = "Serial number tag",
summary = "Serial number tag of the system",
key = "SerialNumberTag"
}
},
(vim.host.SystemIdentificationInfo) {
identifierValue = "Intel Haswell/Wellsburg/Grantley ",
identifierType = (vim.ElementDescription) {
label = "OEM specific string",
summary = "OEM specific string",
key = "OemSpecificString"
}
},
(vim.host.SystemIdentificationInfo) {
identifierValue = "Supermicro motherboard-X10 Series ",
identifierType = (vim.ElementDescription) {
label = "OEM specific string",
summary = "OEM specific string",
key = "OemSpecificString"
}
}
],
memorySize = 137313644544,
cpuModel = "Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000 @ 2.00GHz",
cpuMhz = 2000,
numCpuPkgs = 1,
numCpuCores = 12,
numCpuThreads = 24,
numNics = 4,
numHBAs = 10
},
what do you see in CPU-Z ?The only thing that's weird about it is the CPUID reports 0000.
It is 50-70 usd for retail version now. Hope LGA 3647 finals become available in a year with similar prices.Was $250 in 2018
hi, I am so happy that you are doing well again.Sorry for the long time without reply. I was sick.
Can you save this setting permanently ?Only what you need to do is to set ICC max on rails to 255A.
Save. Done.
What is your output of MFR_EEPROM_CTRL (1Dh)? Maybe chip has PMBUS_RW_PIN_EN disabled which will protect MFR_ICC_MAX from modification. Or a password has been set for PMBUS_RW_PWD_EN. Password can be brute-forced though, only 16-bit, check PWD_CHECK_CMD. There is also ADDR_PH pin but in this case chip would not react on SMBus. Also Page 0 should be selected before rewriting MFR_ICC_MAX.Can you save this setting permanently ?
Are you sure this is BCh and not SMBus command BDh ("MFR_ICC_MAX")?30,BC,2,True,FF04 <- ICC_MAX 2 bytes
was wrong register:So Gigabyte has FF 04 which seems to set ICCMAX to 255+4*2=263A?
- | MFR_OCP_SET_LEVEL[EEh 2bytes] | MFR_ICC_MAX[EFh 1byte] |
- | MFR_OCP_SET_DELAYTIME | MFR_OCP_SET_LEVEL | MFR_ICC_MAX |
X11SPM | 45|B2 | E4 |
MD71 | 45|BC | FF |
"MFR_EEPROM_CTRL (06h) bit[2] (EE_WORD_WR_EN) determines if Page 28/29 is accessible or not." See MP2965.pdf page 114. If you set EE_WORD_WR_EN = 1 then you can use PAGE (00h) command to switch to page 28/29.need access to page 28/29