They are not, and require out-of-tree drivers for Linux, but they generally do still work.![]()
763838-B21 HPE 3.2TB READ INTENSIVE-2 HH/HL PCIE WORKLOAD ACCELERATOR 764127-001 | eBay
HPE 3.2TB READ INTENSIVE-2 HH/HL PCIE WORKLOAD ACCELERATOR. These are Server Drives. Item Condition Clean Pulls / Tested 100% Fully working. Part No 763838-B21. Manufacturer HP. POWER SUPPLIES. GRAPHICS CARDS.www.ebay.com
Anyone know if these are bootable !?
Welp, i was thinking in using it as a games folder drive in Windows.They are not, and require out-of-tree drivers for Linux, but they generally do still work.
Edit: also they're PCIe 2.0.
They may work in Windows, I didn't mean to say it was only usable on Linux, there's a big thread on here that might have that information.Welp, i was thinking in using it as a games folder drive in Windows.
That's a relative term, the write lifetime of any Fusion IO is still absurdly long, performance is still pretty solid, and I believe you can manually set the usable capacity to 2.6TB to get the same effect as buying the write intensive version.The "read intensive" part makes it a no go for me. I read that as crippled.
They all use the same NAND, you can easily write 32PB to the 3.2 and double that to the 6.4TB model no problem... that's just the warrantied wear life as well, it will go much longer.For the last models of FusionIO SSDs its closer to 2DWPD for read intensive and 7DWPD for write intensive, 11PBW for that 3.2TB drive or 32PBW for the 2.6TB write-intensive version which has the same amount of raw NAND onboard.
You can do 7-10 DWPD on all the cards just fine in most cases. It really comes down to your app any any write amplification. Even then, you're likely fine.For the last models of FusionIO SSDs its closer to 2DWPD for read intensive and 7DWPD for write intensive, 11PBW for that 3.2TB drive or 32PBW for the 2.6TB write-intensive version which has the same amount of raw NAND onboard.
That's just marketing. They were pre-provisioned with less unused space for higher capacity, which can put more pressure on the groomer under heavy write workloads and will reduce performance. That provisioning line is fully user adjustable though and you can set it to whatever you want. There's no difference in the physical product.The "read intensive" part makes it a no go for me. I read that as crippled.
Tell me more... I haven't actually seen one die on its own in my years of working for Fusion-io or even maintaining the cards to this date in my home lab.But i had a lot of iodrives dying on me in the past, guess i will pass.
Yep, before the COVID i had two Fusion io cards, one with 3.2tb and other with less (2tb i believe ?!) and both "died" (actually zombified)Tell me more... I haven't actually seen one die on its own in my years of working for Fusion-io or even maintaining the cards to this date in my home lab.
it needs proper cooling! if not the pc will stop , in my case!Yep, before the COVID i had two Fusion io cards, one with 3.2tb and other with less (2tb i believe ?!) and both "died" (actually zombified)
The 3.2tb started reporting as 1tb, then 500 mb and then 1gb.
The 2tb simply disappeared from the pc, simply died.
Both pcie, both with large capacitors.
They both ran hot and IIRC heat probably killed them.