or...Less than $100 per TB seems like a deal right now, and probably into the future.
There's a time and place for hardware upgrades...and then there's a time for perfecting your software/admin/automation skills...
or...Less than $100 per TB seems like a deal right now, and probably into the future.
Even though I spotted this deal, I am banning myself from additional storage purchases until I can reach 10% usage of my current stackor...Question the need for them in the first place.
There's a time and place for hardware upgrades...and then there's a time for perfecting your software/admin/automation skills...
Damn, missed that
Get it done my man! I know it's a slog...lots of F-bombs and "ahhh screw it, I'll do it tomorrow" type of reactions, but once done, it's...glorius.currently lying on the Floor (or Shelves)
I've given up on Starwind. I realized I didn't really need high availability per se, a 15 minute rsync is more than enough to give me the data security I need (This is a mirror of my prod, so the data is already duplicated per se). So, once that requirement went away, I realized, well, why Starwind?I still need to get started with Starwind VSAN Free, unless something else popped up lately ?
This reminds me of the first clusters i built that just used 1meter long threaded rods through all the mobo screwholes and nuts to lock them in place.
Container host...that's the difference. I thought we were talking about a storage server? i.e. You want to use Starwind for a container host?Yeah, but unfortunately you know ... Priorities.
That's somewhat of an off Choice (IMHO). I'm mostly using Debian, Proxmox VE and Fedora (the latter for Podman Containers). I gave a very short try to Alpine/Almalinux/OpenSUSE as Container Hosts but quickly gave up on them.
I still also need to put the 24x AMD Ryxen 3500X/3600X Systems into Operation. Funnily enough I was thinking of buying some SSDs but then the Prices started Skyrocketing (it was a while back, I know). So I guess I'll need to settle to some 1 x 128GB or 2x128GB NVMe Drive or something low-cost like that.
This actually worked out quite well. Part of my problem was noise and cooling, and to a lesser degree, finding the right chassis for a varied configuration of motherboards, serving different purposes.This reminds me of the first clusters i built that just used 1meter long threaded rods through all the mobo screwholes and nuts to lock them in place.
Was oh so fun when needing to remove a mobo half.
Then moved onto something closer to your shelf with screwing it all onto plates, slightly less wobbly.
Agreed, that's just a pain.My Point was actually that I wanted to avoid having way too many Types of Systems/Distributions to maintain.
No. "RHEL", not Fedora. Yes, I know the differences (and similarities) between them. Almalinux is essentially identical to RHEL, without the licensing. Yes, there's a few minor differences, but they really are minor.And while you can argue that Almalinux should be quite similar to Fedora
Openshift...Not sure I would move to paid RHEL when I could pay for Alma support.
So Harvester and Rancher that's a little more mature. Harvester is moving fast, good and bad things about this. Will be nice when it just merges both parts to make life easier, but I'm guessing sales got in the way and forces them to remain distinct products. Harvester already has a bunch of Rancher stuff in it, seems like it shouldn't be hard to put the rest in place and be done. It will require a more stout host to run it all, but in most of the industry, this should be a problem.Openshift...
Thats a cool rack. Do you have more pictures?Get it done my man! I know it's a slog...lots of F-bombs and "ahhh screw it, I'll do it tomorrow" type of reactions, but once done, it's...glorius.
![]()
Two racks...lost of cursing while getting them completed. Here's a funny story. In the compute rack (right rack in the picture above), I thought I had "finalized" my hardware config, built the sleds, mounted them in the rack, was gonna use iSCSI boot for everything (which did work as such), but...due to many different things, plans changed...
I ordered a whole bunch of those adapters that can hold one m.2 sata SSD and one NVME, so I can have SATA boot and one NVME in each sled. Then...had to unmount ALL of the sleds...one by one...add the adapter with SSD and sata cable...mount the sled back...
![]()
![]()
And there's a shit load of them...fun fun fun...
I've given up on Starwind. I realized I didn't really need high availability per se, a 15 minute rsync is more than enough to give me the data security I need (This is a mirror of my prod, so the data is already duplicated per se). So, once that requirement went away, I realized, well, why Starwind?
And it still doesn't do NVME-oF with HA, actually even without HA as well, still is stuck on the 20.04 kernel...no feature parity between different flavors (bare metal vs Proxmox VM vs Windows VM vs ...).
Moved to Truenas and it seemed to fit the bill...but then their RDMA restrictions kicked in...and the frustration began anew...
Been testing RHEL (specifically Almalinux) with Cockpit and surprisingly it works great! The installer is flawless, configuration is straightforward, the documentation is top notch, every flavor of RDMA under the sun, NVME-oF works OOTB...I might stick with this, once I've put everything through its paces.
Thats a cool rack. Do you have more pictures?
I see that pattern quite often. New sellers with zero feedback selling dirt cheap stuff. It's obviously scam but never understood why they do that.zero feedback seller