Enterprise SSD "small deals"

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

T_Minus

Build. Break. Fix. Repeat
Feb 15, 2015
7,818
2,191
113
Yeah, I've purchased 100s of used enterprise drives on ebay from 2010 to today, and from 2010 - 2020 I received less than 5 that had 1PB or greater writes.... my recent ebay order from 4 sellers of 16 total had 4 drives with nearly 5PB writes...

I won't ever buy a QLC drive let alone a used one, but TLC wear out indicator go up much quicker than the old MLC :( that's for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pimposh and nexox

ca3y6

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2021
650
636
93
And no clue as to health. "Used and tested to be working" means absolutely nothing. Patchy seller for sure. Hard pass.
No smart or health info is kind of the norm for enterprise drives on ebay (unfortunately). So requires a bit of a leap of faith, but from my experience, I have rarely been burned by unadvertised low health SSDs on ebay.
 

foureight84

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
371
309
63
No smart or health info is kind of the norm for enterprise drives on ebay (unfortunately). So requires a bit of a leap of faith, but from my experience, I have rarely been burned by unadvertised low health SSDs on ebay.
Plus you can always just return it citing just that. Worn out drive. Usually sellers will say it's in "great condition" whatever that means but when the drive has 10% life left, that's not exactly great condition. I have had several in the 50% and I'm fine with that since 50% for a lot of enterprise drives means years for my use case.
 

BackupProphet

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2014
1,385
1,029
113
Stavanger, Norway
intellistream.ai
Are these easy to reformat to 512?
 

ca3y6

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2021
650
636
93
Netapp SSDs typically are, but haven't tried this particular model myself
 

whoknew123

Member
Jun 21, 2025
30
18
8
So following up on the below drives, I think they may be bricked from the 32k/40k hour bug. They are loaded with firmware NA01, which has the bug. I tried to run them on my unraid server and couldn't get them running. I tried putting an hba into my windows desktop and can't get them to initialize.

Is there anything I can do to verify the hours/confirm they're dead from the bug before I send them back?


Code:
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === 
SMART Health Status: OK 
root@Tower:~# sg_inq /dev/sdaa 
standard INQUIRY: 
PQual=0 PDT=0 RMB=0 LU_CONG=0 hot_pluggable=0 
version=0x03 [SPC] [AERC=0] [TrmTsk=0] NormACA=0 HiSUP=1 Resp_data_format=2 SCCS=0 ACC=0 TPGS=0 3PC=0 Protect=1 [BQue=0]     EncServ=0 MultiP=1 (VS=0) [MChngr=0] [ACKREQQ=0] Addr16=0 [RelAdr=0] WBus16=0 Sync=0 [Linked=0] [TranDis=0] CmdQue=1 [SPI:  Clocking=0x0 QAS=0 IUS=0] length=96 (0x60) 
Peripheral device type: disk 
Vendor identification: NETAPP Product identification: X356_TPM4V3T8AME 
Product revision level: NA01 
root@Tower:~# 
sg_readcap /dev/sdaa 
read capacity(10): 
Descriptor format, current; Sense key: Hardware Error 
ASC=44, vendor specific qualification ASCQ=d1 (hex) 
Descriptor type: Vendor specific [0x80] 00 25 74 02 01 1b 00 00 00 00 00 00 79 00 00 1d 32 21 1e 00 00 00 00 00 55 09 00 00 00 00 
read capacity(10): pass-through requested 8 bytes (data-in), got 0 bytes 
READ CAPACITY (10) failed: Medium or hardware error sg_readcap failed: Medium or hardware error