Thank you sir. I'm going to check mine. I assumed it had the garbage firmware so I stopped using it. going to fire it up and check.
To be clear: I don't own that specific Drive. I own the X357A.Thank you sir. I'm going to check mine. I assumed it had the garbage firmware so I stopped using it. going to fire it up and check.
They actually listed them at 679ea in the beginning and when i tried to haggle them down to 500 each they actaully jacked up the price ans said 679 was a pricing errorFound a potential deal for the Australians among us:
eBay.com.au - Cisco / Samsung PM893 7.68TB SATA SSD UCS-SD76T6S1X-EV
4x units listed @ 769 AUD each, or 699 with an eBay+ code
In the listing the photo is of a drive with a manufacturing date of 2022, though that may not apply to all of them- and no details are provided about their current health; also, and sorry for being ignorant on the topic, but was Cisco one of the vendors that locks down their drives/makes it a pain to update the firmware?
(Actually are these even usable in a non-Cisco system)
Looks like maybe they could have been reformatted to 512b....I did a lot more research on these IBM drives after I pulled the trigger and wrorked out it was unlikely I could reformat one. (Thank you for pointing that out to me!). I ended up asking the seller if these were 512b otherwise I might want to refund them and then they just responded with "no 512b" followed by a refund.
looks like he corrected the listing as 3.84TB @ $180 each and sold quickly.Intel D7-P5510 7.68TB, NVMe, PCIe 4.0X4 3D TLC U.2 15mm 1DWPD 2.5" Internal $300
Description says 7.68TB (pretty good deal for a PCIe4 drive), photo shows 3.84TB so buyers beware.
Another 24x formatted to 512b and relistedwould be curious thank you. My previous experience with IBM SAS were not good.
though that's the wrong screenshot (it's a 7.68TB drive, the one advertised is 6.4TB).Wow, almost 6PB written…