@Klee usually when older cores are faster like that it is Speed Step.
You are so lucky, you should have a farm of cheap E5 miner making big $$$$with the .097 kwh electricity I have
Apparently at STH dual E5-2690 V1 = NAS CPUHummm maybe I need to be on the lookout for some E5-2690's.... with the .097 kwh electricity I have.
I run all my mining nodes with 1 gb per cpu.1 gig stick per cpu
I believed Klee is using dual E5-2660 per node, so it is 8 cores per cpu, the number that you are seeing is NUMA physical + virtual core number.How many cores are in the CPU on the right? The sensor only shows 8 cores per CPU but they're numbered strangely.
How many cores are in the CPU on the right? The sensor only shows 8 cores per CPU but they're numbered strangely.
I believed Klee is using dual E5-2660 per node, so it is 8 cores per cpu, the number that you are seeing is NUMA physical + virtual core number.
Determining NUMA node boundaries for modern CPUs | SHAREPOINT BUILDING BLOCKS
Apparently at STH dual E5-2690 V1 = NAS CPU
Any word on power consumption @Klee? I see that several people asking in the thread, but no reply as yet. I would love to know so I can figure out what the return would be per open compute server given my local currency and electricity spot rate. Compared to using a 1080 Ti (0.4 h/s/$), Genesis Mining (0.9 h/s/$), or the 4-node Supermicro server I found on eBay (0.5 H/s/$), your open compute solution is by far and away the most efficient at 2.5 h/s/$. But that only accounts for the server output - how about the inputs?
Also, just out of curiosity, is the RAM you are using error correcting? I guess it does not really matter while mining, but might be a consideration if you intend to use the nodes for something else later.
Update: I see from the Wiwynn SV7210 datasheet that each node is rated at 300W max. That will do for back of the envelope calculations.