Hey folks,
I was wondering and have been asking around concerning a few Chelsio T4x & T5x (UWAs), I'm waiting on a delivery to test out the Chelsio T420 within my Free/TrueNAS server which will raise the throughput to 10GbE per port (roughly), but I'm also embarking on testing the T580 which has two QSFP ports (fits in well with my 36x QSFP-40GbE switch) but I'm wondering if there will be any limitations.
Seems stupid right, but some of my current CX-2 NICs even though support IPoIB cannot get past 10GbE using IPoIB even while rated on a 40GbE channel link, I'm wondering if anyone could confirm that the T580 while rated at 40GbE per QSFP port will roughly run at the same speed when installed under Free/TrueNAS or will I be limited again to 10GbE per port and wasting £100+ on a board when the T420 could just do the job for now.
If anyone has ran the numbers of using said T580, I would love to hear from you
Kind regards,
Derwood
I was wondering and have been asking around concerning a few Chelsio T4x & T5x (UWAs), I'm waiting on a delivery to test out the Chelsio T420 within my Free/TrueNAS server which will raise the throughput to 10GbE per port (roughly), but I'm also embarking on testing the T580 which has two QSFP ports (fits in well with my 36x QSFP-40GbE switch) but I'm wondering if there will be any limitations.
Seems stupid right, but some of my current CX-2 NICs even though support IPoIB cannot get past 10GbE using IPoIB even while rated on a 40GbE channel link, I'm wondering if anyone could confirm that the T580 while rated at 40GbE per QSFP port will roughly run at the same speed when installed under Free/TrueNAS or will I be limited again to 10GbE per port and wasting £100+ on a board when the T420 could just do the job for now.
If anyone has ran the numbers of using said T580, I would love to hear from you
Kind regards,
Derwood