1.9.1 firmware for HORACO ZX-SWTG124AS
https://cdn.shoplazza.com/8efdbb869825ef78e5a373cf252f1e7c.zip
https://cdn.shoplazza.com/8efdbb869825ef78e5a373cf252f1e7c.zip
Confirmed working on my HORACO ZX-SWTG124AS. Many thanks1.9.1 firmware for HORACO ZX-SWTG124AS
https://cdn.shoplazza.com/8efdbb869825ef78e5a373cf252f1e7c.zip
My model is " LG-SWTG124AS ", with Ver 1.9 firmware. Can I upgrade using this version?1.9.1 firmware for HORACO ZX-SWTG124AS
https://cdn.shoplazza.com/8efdbb869825ef78e5a373cf252f1e7c.zip
Well I bit the bullet and it does work on this model.My model is " LG-SWTG124AS ", with Ver 1.9 firmware. Can I upgrade using this version?
Thanks - also worked for me!Well I bit the bullet and it does work on this model.
My model is " LG-SWTG124AS ", with Ver 1.9 firmware. Can I upgrade using this version?
Well I bit the bullet and it does work on this model.
This is the response I got from Aliexpress support for HoracoThanks - also worked for me!
Thank you for this. I was not sure because of the first two letters being different and now we know. Thank you.This is the response I got from Aliexpress support for Horaco
"Same firmware
LG - ZX is just the internal model for the type of power supply"
Hope this clears it for everyone
BTW, I also upgraded today to v1.9.1. My model is - LG-SWTG124AS
Cheers!
This is identical to the firmware provided by SODOLA on their website for "SL-SWTG124AS-D":Here's link for 1.9 firmware and manual from HORACO:
Web manual-(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PHLmQ58ZV3oD-gS2nSWsIe-R0jKKMvVN/view?usp=sharing)
Firmware- (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yzEZnRH4A5bM-fUlQ54IB1fmcbxu82xP/view?usp=drive_link)
I don't know why it's named as SWTGW124AS, but it seems to work just fine.
I've done a few days ago a quick test with firmware v1.9 setting ports 1-4 each on a different vlan, untagged (also setting pvid for each of them) and the management IP was reachable from all of them. Imagine having DHCP on all VLANS and the switch set to DHCP, that'll be fun.Does anyone have any experience of changing the management VLAN on these switches? Whilst you can set the IP of the switch into the subnet you desire, the switch is not accessible unless you are plugged into a port in VLAN1. I don't really want VLAN 1 hanging around, but I can't see any other way to avoid that with this.
That is amazing! I don't have one of the switches handy right now but more terraform is always betterI'm creating a terraform provider for this model but I'm still on 1.9 so not sure if will work on 1.9.1 - if you test let me know if it works
I wouldn't be surprised if it is the same problem as the managed ones had, but those apparently had software control on the grounding/pwm/gain/dc-dc regulators/whatever, they can't do that on an unmanaged switch since there is nothing to upload (patch-wise, but I imagine it's the same hardware but just no software loaded - maybe adding an SPI flash and loading the firmware turns them into managed switches).I'd avoid buying any of the unmanaged 4 RJ45 + 2 SFP+ switches if you plan on using any DAC cables. (I've recently bought both a HiSource and a Horaco switch.)
The DAC cable either doesn't link at all, or if does link, experiences speed degradation. With a FS.com 1 meter cable, I don't get the full speed (about 7Gb/s), and with a 5 meter cable, it barely works (at 1Mb/s - lol.)
Interesting.I'd avoid buying any of the unmanaged 4 RJ45 + 2 SFP+ switches if you plan on using any DAC cables. (I've recently bought both a HiSource and a Horaco switch.)
The DAC cable either doesn't link at all, or if does link, experiences speed degradation. With a FS.com 1 meter cable, I don't get the full speed (about 7Gb/s), and with a 5 meter cable, it barely works (at 1Mb/s - lol.)
I'd avoid buying any of the unmanaged 4 RJ45 + 2 SFP+ switches if you plan on using any DAC cables. (I've recently bought both a HiSource and a Horaco switch.)
The DAC cable either doesn't link at all, or if does link, experiences speed degradation. With a FS.com 1 meter cable, I don't get the full speed (about 7Gb/s), and with a 5 meter cable, it barely works (at 1Mb/s - lol.)
Your server will have a 10Gb connection. The transfer maximum between the two obviously will be limited to the slowest of the two.I'm at the verge of buying the SWTG124AS HORACO managed switch (4x2.5G RJ45 & 2x10G SFP+) but something came up at my mind:
Assuming that I'm fully using the 2.5G switch port from my main desktop, If I connect a 1G/10G NIC from a server using DAC to the switch SFP+ port, will I be able to have 2.5G speed when connecting to my server by my desktop? or will it negotiate at 1G because the server NIC doesn't support 2.5G.
In simple terms, can this or any other switch transceive between different NICs running at different speeds? (2.5G and 10G), just like some transceivers are able to negotiate at higher speeds even when the NIC doesn't support.
I'm at the verge of buying the SWTG124AS HORACO managed switch (4x2.5G RJ45 & 2x10G SFP+) but something came up at my mind:
Assuming that I'm fully using the 2.5G switch port from my main desktop, If I connect a 1G/10G NIC from a server using DAC to the switch SFP+ port, will I be able to have 2.5G speed when connecting to my server by my desktop? or will it negotiate at 1G because the server NIC doesn't support 2.5G.
In simple terms, can this or any other switch transceive between different NICs running at different speeds? (2.5G and 10G), just like some transceivers are able to negotiate at higher speeds even when the NIC doesn't support.