BTRFS RAID 5/6 found to be unsafe

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

Cheddoleum

Member
Feb 19, 2014
103
23
18
Hopefully no one was thinking of doing that anyway: RAID5/6 were never claimed to be production ready. Scrub couldn't actually fix problems, failed or missing drives not handled. Even when btrfs was tagged as experimental, RAID5/6 had specific warnings of all over it.
 

rubylaser

Active Member
Jan 4, 2013
847
236
43
Michigan, USA
Hopefully no one was thinking of doing that anyway: RAID5/6 were never claimed to be production ready. Scrub couldn't actually fix problems, failed or missing drives not handled. Even when btrfs was tagged as experimental, RAID5/6 had specific warnings of all over it.
BTRFS RAID5/6 had been mentioned as being stable recently and the warnings removed from the btrfs wiki. It is also the foundation of Rockstor (Not that I would have used something so unproven on important data without much more testing).

I'm just glad there are other alternatives like ZFS on Linux, SnapRAID, or even the old venerable mdadm.

I just wanted to make sure people were aware of this. I hope this issue doesn't bite anyone here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EluRex