I should not eat cereal on the morning of April 2. the milk came out of my nose... too effing funny.ok, here's how to enable icx6610 fan swaps. Connected over serial, enter the OS console using the key command (ctrl + y, let go, press m). Once in console run the following commands:
Code:OS>toggle aprilfools 1 OS>thiswillliterallyneverwork OS>unlessthelawsofthermodynamics OS>vastlychange
well played, very well done...ok, here's how to enable icx6610 fan swaps. Connected over serial, enter the OS console using the key command (ctrl + y, let go, press m). Once in console run the following commands:
Code:OS>toggle aprilfools 1 OS>thiswillliterallyneverwork OS>unlessthelawsofthermodynamics OS>vastlychange
Partially. Most likely a static discharge or power surge on one of the ethernet cables has fried the PoE controller chips on the board... I've seen some photos in which the chips have a hole punched through the plastic moulding of their casesIs my ICX6450-48P salvageable? I checked the caps on the powersupply and a few other components but didn't really find anything wrong. There's about three fuses on the PSU hidden behind some heat shrinking tube.
POE doesnt work and throws the following error:
ICX6450-48P Router(config)#PoE Info: Resetting module in slot 1....completed.
PoE Error: Device 0 failed to start on PoE module.
PoE Error: Device 1 failed to start on PoE module.
Resetting module in slot 1 again to recover from dev fault
This is VERY strange, it's the first time I see something like this... are you sure that the lags go away as you shut those two interfaces? Have you got anything plugged on those ports?I also noticed a strange issue with the switch where if e1/1/45 to 1/1/48 aren't shut down the switch seems to 'lag' or get stuck and it reflects that latency in the pings sent to the switch
Reply from 10.111.122.222: bytes=32 time=471ms TTL=63
Reply from 10.111.122.222: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=63
Reply from 10.111.122.222: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=63
Reply from 10.111.122.222: bytes=32 time=466ms TTL=63
No, I believe you! I was just asking because to me it seemed very very strange... Well, we might need to call out for @fohdeesha, as personally I have no clue on what might be causing a latency so high on those ports...100% positive on the shutting the ports down thing because i noticed the same latency while consoled in! I can record a video if you'd like =)
I slowly incremented the disabling across all ports.. i.e. int e 1/1/1 to 1/1/20 ->disa then 21 to 30 until i got to those last 4 ports
Sure, i'll give it a shot now - only port that has anything plugged into it is mgmt1No, I believe you! I was just asking because to me it seemed very very strange... Well, we might need to call out for @fohdeesha, as personally I have no clue on what might be causing a latency so high on those ports...
BTW, are these interfaces plugged to something?
To me what seems strange is the latency you're experiencing on the console... it should be completely separated from the data plane.
Those latencies are measured from PC to switch or from PC to another device of the network?
I think that these delays might be caused by the bad PoE board... it might be trying to poll some power statistics or status on those interfaces and hangs by the non responsive fryed chips... Would you mind trying again with the PoE daughter board disconnected?
that's indeed not normal and I can't reproduce it here. Can you paste the output of "show run" and "show version", and double-confirm nothing is plugged into those ports?Sure, i'll give it a shot now - only port that has anything plugged into it is mgmt1
Same results with the POE card out:
![]()
Not that I can think of, but il will complain at boot time that it doesn't have enough power budget to enable PoE on the high gruup of ports (ot at least, the one with less priority if you've configured it, otherwise, the lower the interface number, the more priority it gets in case of power budget exhaustion).Is there any any down side to enabling POE on all the ports of my ICX 6450-48 POE, instead of just the ones that actually need POE?
And it will also not blow any non POE devices connected to the switch as well?Not that I can think of, but il will complain at boot time that it doesn't have enough power budget to enable PoE on the high gruup of ports (ot at least, the one with less priority if you've configured it, otherwise, the lower the interface number, the more priority it gets in case of power budget exhaustion).
It will honor any PD request even on those, unless, as stated, other devices on the interface with higher priority consume all the available budget.
I think that unplugging woud be enough... but the real question is: why bother?Hi,
Quick question.
I have a ICX6450-24 POE - but I am not using any POE and will never get to use it - do I need to do anything special if I remove the POE board?
Thanks
Absolutely not.And it will also not blow any non POE devices connected to the switch as well?
Any watt saved is worth the effort - both from an economical point of view - I pay $0.35 per KW - but also from an environmental point of view - if its not needed and easily removed, its worth itmaybe maybe you can shave off ~1W of power consumption
Just tryed it... I was thinking of it, but my mind the last night didn't connect all the dots...Ok, I'm out of ideas
Just for the sake of completeness: mgmt port is connected directly to the CPU, it is not part of the switched ports... maybe it causes some delay? I've onestly not tryed it yet... I might give it a shot tomorrow (now in Italy it's 1:30 AM...) on my 6450 24P, basically because now I'm curious
In any case, it doesn't explain why when you shut those ports the latencies go down...
I know, I live in Italy where energy (for private citizen at least) has one of the higher cost of all European countries, but probably the most energy hogging part of the PoE when idle is the +48V rail of the PSU, rather than the board itself.Any watt saved is worth the effort - both from an economical point of view - I pay $0.35 per KW - but also from an environmental point of view - if its not needed and easily removed, its worth it
Furthermore it might make my switch run just a teeny bit cooler
I know money wise it will take a while before I can buy a cup of cofee, but every bit counts![]()
I knowooking at a mere energy consumption standpoint, you should have bought the -24, rather than the -24P