So the Q03J Asrock combination did not work. I freaked out without computer power so there is an Asus Sage again. When i ran it before i thought my memory overclock was working. I thought so because it showed in linux that the installed speed was 6000MT. The bios also shows it. And when i did the Aida64 Benchmark, i also had High scores, some of it a bit better than Joseph. It is not a competition but just a reference. AIDA64 shows. also memory speed as set in bios here in screenshot 6200MT. But HWinfo only showed 2400x2 so 4800. This bothered me and i did not know who to believe. So now i had the opportunity to test everything once more: one time with 6200 in the bios and one time with 4800 in the bios, everything else the same, to see if there was a difference.And to see if Aida64 or HWinfo was right? and...
So it seems that there is not really a measurable difference, and if there is a difference it is towards the 4800MT setting strange enough! So i think HWinfo is right, and my overclock is not really working. But for Joseph his overclock is showing in HWinfo, so his overclock works. However besides latency, i seem to have a bit faster bandwidth about 234 vs 265 +13% for reading. and similar for copy and write. Similar score made me believe that the overclock was working, before. Also in my own application, i think i was sloppy and compared this score with the one of the 5600 Fury pro sticks. However, now it seems that the overclock setting, is not really the cause of the performance.
My guess is that it is the difference is because of dual rank vs single rank. But i am not sure.
Kizune, Bert, anyone else... if you also have Servermemory running overclocked. Does it really show in HWinfo? Maybe you other than me, really succeeded in overclocking, or is it similar as here?
Another weird thing is this turbo max of 4700 for the cpu?
So it seems that there is not really a measurable difference, and if there is a difference it is towards the 4800MT setting strange enough! So i think HWinfo is right, and my overclock is not really working. But for Joseph his overclock is showing in HWinfo, so his overclock works. However besides latency, i seem to have a bit faster bandwidth about 234 vs 265 +13% for reading. and similar for copy and write. Similar score made me believe that the overclock was working, before. Also in my own application, i think i was sloppy and compared this score with the one of the 5600 Fury pro sticks. However, now it seems that the overclock setting, is not really the cause of the performance.
My guess is that it is the difference is because of dual rank vs single rank. But i am not sure.
Kizune, Bert, anyone else... if you also have Servermemory running overclocked. Does it really show in HWinfo? Maybe you other than me, really succeeded in overclocking, or is it similar as here?
Another weird thing is this turbo max of 4700 for the cpu?
Attachments
-
323.2 KB Views: 10
-
304.9 KB Views: 10
Last edited: