right, ok.
How are x399 and trx40 platforms designed to be obsolete from the get go?
EDIT:
My viewpoint:
You: Throws around accusations, opinions theories and "facts" or "proof".
Others and me: Something is fishy here, are you sure about that?
You: YES, more proof and pointed out what they didn't see or got wrong.
Others like me: Some things are still fishy and that (something) seems close to what you accuse someone of.
Whats with X y and Z? Why did you Benchmark B with C settings?
Questions ...
You: Here is more "proof" on something (un? tangentially?) related that shows i'm right.
Others: this is getting out of hand and off topic.
You are "proving" INTELs innocence in a AMD Bashing thread and it derailed there from you accusing AMD of all things bad under sun.
That has a certain taste to it.
To be fair, i'm not sure if i'm to stupid to understand some of your answers but i am at least left with the impression that there are questions left you have never responded on directly.
The primary one that i started with in this thread is the one above the edit.
I'm not sure if that is due to the "keeping face" cultural thing or if i just missed it.
If it is the latter, well, please repeat it again and sorry for the inconvenience.
All of them are explained, and I didn't see any following questions.Whats with X y and Z? Why did you Benchmark B with C settings?
First, did you have any doubt that what I said they did actually happen?You are "proving" INTELs innocence in a AMD Bashing thread and it derailed there from you accusing AMD of all things bad under sun.
Y - Just look at those proofs again and tell me if there is anything more needed.
N - Then did Intel side did the same thing, which is spreading a lot of biased/false/misleading info which can't be replicated in any experiment, and personal-attacking everyone who disagrees? Or other things that have similar social effects?
Y - Kindly point that out please.
N - That's what I saw for now.
Think I've answered everything, directly, in that list. Anything else needs extra explanation?i am at least left with the impression that there are questions left you have never responded on directly.
I never talked about faces actually. What I'm against is somebody took what technically can't be said correct, and accuse people of "cherry picking" and "misleading" even "bribed", while cherry picking and misleading things all the time.I'm not sure if that is due to the "keeping face" cultural thing or if i just missed it.
And even worse, he thinks proofs are not needed when accusing others.
From the start I never said something like intel destroy amd in every situation, like at all. All I criticize is their behavior, and I, like many others, are extremely unsatisfied with the unnecessary, escalating conflict and rumors what amd or its fans have created in the community. I hate it when people just think, oh you talk bad about AMD, so you are an intel fan.
Last edited: