2nd hand U.2 SSD usage problem

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

randomname

New Member
Jan 24, 2021
21
6
3
If you do not have bifurcation enabled for that slot, it would explain a lot. Even the janky manufacturer says this card needs bifurcation.
Hello, no this is not related to bifurication. Bifurication works. The SSD is recognised via both U.2 connectors on the card in the Bios, in Windows, and in a LiveCD Linux.
 

randomname

New Member
Jan 24, 2021
21
6
3
I would not recommend these for any serious use but $15 cards without any buffering worked fine for PCIe4.
Thanks, but I need two U.2 due to PCIe slot limitations...If I use something like this I'd lose 4 lanes.

Looking at something like this
 

jei

Active Member
Aug 8, 2021
201
128
43
Finland
Thanks, but I need two U.2 due to PCIe slot limitations...If I use something like this I'd lose 4 lanes.
There are 2 slot models if your MB supports bifurcation. Not personally tried those.

edit: But basically most cards should work, just avoid obvious janky ones.
 

nexox

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2023
1,959
975
113
I wonder if the buffer, with its 4 outputs, is required for multiple devices in a bifurcated slot - the cards I have seem to include a similar size chip, but that means not great things for mixing 3.0 and 4.0 devices in one slot.
 

randomname

New Member
Jan 24, 2021
21
6
3
I wonder if the buffer, with its 4 outputs, is required for multiple devices in a bifurcated slot - the cards I have seem to include a similar size chip, but that means not great things for mixing 3.0 and 4.0 devices in one slot.
That would suck, because I am indeed going to plug in a 3.0 and a 4.0 SSD
 

jei

Active Member
Aug 8, 2021
201
128
43
Finland
Maybe get the 1-slot "dumb" card just for debugging purposes, it doesn't cost much. Like @Tech Junky said there are more options for Gen4 with Oculink/MCIO riser cards if you have physical space to mount the drives someplace else than PCIe slot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: randomname

nexox

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2023
1,959
975
113
Yeah looking at the pinouts of x8 and x16 slots there's just one REFCLK pair, so any bifurcation adapter (including those with OCuLink or MCIO ports) would need to buffer and split that, what I don't know is whether the clock speed is actually different between 3.0 and 4.0 or whether 4.0 just sends more bits per clock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: randomname

nexox

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2023
1,959
975
113
In any case, that board from Micro SATA Cables looks significantly more legit, I imagine it would run 4.0 fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: randomname

CyklonDX

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2022
1,795
642
113
After reading this, i would lean that one of the parts on the adapter or disk itself (controller) heats up and gets thermally killed. *i would recommend removing the disk plastic shroud and look at it with thermal camera or temp laser.

The pcie signaling compatibility is 100% not the issue. If it was issue the system would keep screaming about it ~ about wrong messages, and stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: randomname

Chriggel

Active Member
Mar 30, 2024
157
85
28
StarTech is usually very professional about this, so I expected that there's a note in the product description about U.2 incompatibility, and there is:
Install an SFF-TA-1001 SSD into a desktop or server using an available PCI Express 4.0 slot. The pre-installed full-profile bracket and included drive mounting screws enable the connection of a U.3 NVMe drive to a PCIe slot, avoiding the need for a drive backplane or additional cables. This adapter is not compatible with U.2 drives.
In general, U.2 hosts are compatible with U.2 and U.3 drives. U.3 hosts are only compatible with U.3 drives. Depending on the implementation, U.3 hosts could actually be trimode with SATA/SAS/NVMe, but with these adapters it's always NVMe only, obviously.