Anyone get these working with SATA HDD's in raid/non raid mode? Trying latest Debian and it won't see the controller or drives. Not sure if I'm missing something or not.
Same here. Using a SATA SD in AHCI mode for Proxmox.I was able to use a Sata SSD and a Sata HDD in basic ahci mode with freebsd and proxmox and esxi recognizing... No special effort.
It's a micro-ATX form factor so I suspect it would. Better check to see if there's a I/O shield available for it if one is not included.Will the motherboard fit in a micro-ATX case?
I measure 9.6" wide; however, 12" deep.It's a micro-ATX form factor so I suspect it would. Better check to see if there's a I/O shield available for it if one is not included.
Then it shouldn't be advertised as M-ATX, it should be Proprietary.I measure 9.5" wide; however, 12" deep.
IIRC, mATX is 9.5 x 9.5.
So, it would fit width-wise, like slots. However, you'll need a deep deep chassis.
Humm, I have a NIB Supermicro mATX case in the garage. I wonder how deep of a mobo it would allow.
EDIT:
So, I doubt it would fit in any mATX chassis as that's usually the area for drive bays, radiators, fans, etc.
- The memory slots comes all the way forward to 11", as measured from the rear of the board.
- The CPU socket/heatsink comes all the way forward to 10", as measured from the rear of the board.
- Not to mention a lot of the connectors are at the very front of the board, needing clearance.
Let's take the Supermicro CSE-731i-300B: It would fit if I removed the cage that holds all 4 x 3.5" drive bays as the drive cage would hit the memory/slots and CPU cooler/socket (but who would want to do that?).
However, there are no stand-off to mount the front of the board in that area.
That's not the same motherboard. It doesn't have 3x 45nm power-hungry large heatsinked Intel X550 10GBaseT chips.
Source: https://drunkencat.net/misc/X10SLH-LN6TF.pdfDimensions ATX form factor (9.6" x 12") (243.84 mm x 304.8 mm)
It's not that high.Looks like power usage is high even when NICs are disabled. I remember this was also reported before. Can we assume that disabling NICs with jumper does not power them down?
Considering there are other things connected to the PLX chip, such as the primary x16 (x8 lanes) PCIe slot, I would say so.I wonder if the plx chip consumes power even if the nics are disabled
IMO, the retail version of the X10SLH-F does not come with the 3x Intel X540-T2 10GBaseT NICs - and therefore no way to control (initialize?) them.I noticed reading through the forum that someone updated the bmc firmware with the one posted for the x10slh-f board on supermicro's site. Have anyone tested this and found it safe to do so. If you need them my specs are:
pfSense 2.5.2
E3-1230v3
4x - samsung 8gb pc3l-12800 ecc udimm
intel i350-t4 quad port gig nic
silicom i350am2 six port gig nic
2x - 64gb supermicro satadom boot drive (RAID 1)
I appreciate you taking the time to read my message and provide help.
I have the bios, I was looking at updating the BMC firmware with the one on the x10slh-f pageIMO, the retail version of the X10SLH-F does not come with the 3x Intel X540-T2 10GBaseT NICs - and therefore no way to control (initialize?) them.
The custom BIOS we have on the X10SLH-LN6TF does have the BIOS controls for them.