1TB 2.5" HDD for Hypervisor system

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

cesmith9999

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2013
1,421
470
83
from lost_benji

  • PFSense works best on hardware, regardless of those who insist on trying to virtualise it.

I would like to Virtualise my router. however, there are issues of W(D)AF (Wife (Daughter) acceptance factor) where this needs to be a separate piece of hardware so that if the server goes down, Internet does not go down with it.

Chris
 

weust

Active Member
Aug 15, 2014
353
44
28
44
But if your physical router goes down, so does your internet connection.
What is the difference? Or is it that the W&D can re-connect the power to the physical router themselves, instead of you having to mess around with the VM?
 

cesmith9999

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2013
1,421
470
83
the difference is that my server can reboot (patch) or I can just shut it down for a few days and my other internet access is not affected.
 

cesmith9999

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2013
1,421
470
83
at home. not yet. looking at doing that in the future. but I need a 2nd server. Trying to figure out how I want to do that. if I want to do a shared SAS or go with the new shared nothing cluster in Windows Server 10.

At work, I am not at liberty to discuss...

I have a spare machine at home that can easily be a router just lying around the house.
 

weust

Active Member
Aug 15, 2014
353
44
28
44
I am going to stick to one machine. Nothing important that can't be (temporary) solved with another device.

It's too bad there are no NUCs with dual LAN.
That might make me build a cluster then, but using VLANs to pull everything over a single 1Gbit NIC isn't very nice...
 

weust

Active Member
Aug 15, 2014
353
44
28
44
Hmm, interesting...

I got my PlayStation set up in pfsense to not be in a DMZ but in the LAN now, it's the right NAT and Rules setup. So that eliminates a port, and don't need ISCSI anymore too since I can't use that they at I was hoping I could use it.

Need to rethink some options again now...
 

Lost-Benji

Member
Jan 21, 2013
424
23
18
The arse end of the planet
Even Pfsense is more up to date security wise than most of the router firmwares available. Also it is used to be cheaper to set up a router distribution than to get the top of the line Atheros rebranded router and still run into the limits with a high # connections and dead slow interfaces.
....and it breaks even quicker too.
 

Lost-Benji

Member
Jan 21, 2013
424
23
18
The arse end of the planet
Spazoid, I know what I will do and how to do it. The topic was purely about the hard drives to use.
Nothing more. The de-railing wasn't my fault?
Hang on, you tried to end the thread at post #29 then you decide to have another come-back two posts later with this response:

You came to the forums and asked a question: "1TB 2.5" HDD for Hypervisor system"

You listed a heap of things to use it for and then asked for advice, for which is what you got.
You didn't like the answers and started to argue even when your own reasoning isn't sound.

You then decide to keep going anyway....

Torrents in a VM on a mirrored array holding your other VM's, if the array fails, you loose more than just your porn downloads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andrewbedia