After two samples, N100's CPU mark is 3220, meaning that the second sample was much higher. At least it looks like the second run wasn't worse than N5100.
Isn't it easier to plonk your phone in with USB and use USB tethering to get a connection for the installation? I haven't tried it with Win11 but it would be stupid if that didn't work.
Since the results for some of the tests were higher than N5105, it makes me wonder if the CPU ran the first tests with aggressive boost clocks and then throttled down to base clock (or lower) for the last tests. Maybe it ran out of thermal or power budget.
It can also be just a bad run for any...
There's now a single benchmark result in Passmark's database for the new Intel N100 CPU. It shouldn't be trusted too much, but it doesn't look as good as I hoped either. The single threaded score is on par with N5105 while the overall score is even behind N5100.
Still need to wait for a proper...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.