Search results

Pm‘ed regarding SSD (from Munich).

_NF stands for „no fear“ as the uploader of that firmware might have it tested with own ssd. Correct me if I’m remembering that wrong @DarkServant

Short: a) yes, please update. There have been ugly errors in SSD firmware in the past (try googling for „35k hours ssd brick bug“ to get ideas how ugly…). b) yes, can be done outside of HPE systems.

Those Samsungs / Intel mentioned by NablaSquaredG + Seagate Nytro 1551 960GB 6G SATA Mainstream Endurance (3DWPD) SSD I use 20+ of those Seagate (1.92TB) and they offer reliable good speed under real world loads, especially small random writes are outstanding for Sata...

Does it still kind of „NVME over SAS“ like the 94xx Tri-band or plain PCIE NVME?

Highpoint NVME Raid Controller Several models for Gen3 and Gen4, several form factors (U.2, M.2) but one common thing: priceeeeey.

You are completely right. Shame on me and my google skills.....

I must extend my reading skills… Thanks!

I checked the block diagram but doesn’t seem to offer more than 48 lanes. It has 2 x16, 1 x8 and one x4 = 44 lanes plus 4 lanes for the DMI to the C621. Pretty standard like many C621 boards. Looking for a board which really exposes 64 lanes if Xeon W-32xx is used.

Yes, 64 lanes. Thanks, will have a look at this board.

As title says: I am wondering if there is any motherboard available wich makes use of the 60 PCIE lanes of Xeon W-31xx / W-32xx processors? All boards I came across seems to be limited to the 48 lanes of Xeon Scalable Gen.1/2.

Unfortunately not, lost my sheet I started in the past. At least several SanDisk from that area are known to be affected as well. Mostly HP ones. Depends on the use case. Today I surely would go for one or two 30 TB NVME instead 12 4TB SAS. When I bought them SAS was much cheaper than NVME for...

Full ACK. But I answered to which is most likely a M10….

Yes, PM1633 are affected by the 32k hours bug. Dell EMC identified them as vulnerable in a service release of their VNX systems. Quoting Dell: „MZILS1T9HCHP | MZILS3T8HCJM | MZILS480HCGR | MZILS960HCHP sentenced to death on CQPG, CQPH -> fixed on CQPJ A fellow member of this forum added...

I had several of this older M10 (16GB and 32GB) failures in the past. If they died they did it spontaneously and completely. Just dead. The 800p and p1600x sticks are doing fine up to now. But: I would strongly rethink (in fact, don’t do it) creating an special device whiteout redundancy, even...

Most likely it’s just a corrupt installer file. Definitely not related to any missing driver or TPM module. Error 0x80070570 is a generic „system files corrupted“ error. Just create a new installer device (download the ISO again, use another USB stick) and start from scratch.

Give it a try: smartctl -x

LSI 9305-16i is the successor of the 9300-16i. Runs cooler, consumes less power as it has only one chip instead of the two chips of the 9300-16i. Stable drivers for almost all operating systems.

Well, SM863 and SM863a topped at 1.92TB. SM883 3.84TB exists on paper but really seldom in the wild. Afraid they never will become affordable if ever hit the 2nd market.

Sure. Go to Bios —> Advanced—> AMD CBS —> FCH common options—> AC powerloss options and set it to „previous“. Done.