Wow, tight fit with the SFP+ PHY... it's cool they managed to shoehorn it!Look what I just got today!
A Gigabyte MB10-DS5 engineering sample. That's a Xeon D-1581 with 16-cores/32-threads with 2 x 1GbE and 2 x 10GbE SFP+!
Except it does not support ECC, no 10G network integrated. All depends what you plan to use it for really.just checked that i7-6700t has a passmark of 9000, tdp 35w, 1151 socket has a lot of flexibility of motherboard and add ons. probably a more affordable solution for low tdp server solution than low mid range xeon d?
Just adding to this the huge one, the Xeon D can support 128GB of RAM / RDIMMs. At some point, you always want more RAM.Except it does not support ECC, no 10G network integrated. All depends what you plan to use it for really.
Don't know how I forgot that given mine will be 128gb loaded (memory sitting here waiting for my boards... Only a few more sleeps )Just adding to this the huge one, the Xeon D can support 128GB of RAM / RDIMMs. At some point, you always want more RAM.
There are a couple of differences internally actually. The 15x1 are aimed for storage, 15x7 for compute and 15x8 for network performance. I am not sure what 15x9 is for though...Now that there are 1518, 1520, 1521, 1527, 1528, 1529, 1531, 1537, 1539, 1540, 1541, 1548, 1557, 1559, 1567, 1571, 1577, 1581 and 1587, are there any other differences between these than the number of cores, the frequency, the TDP or the presence or absence of turbo? Were some of these supposed to be "networking" units and some "storage" units? I guess 1520 is replaced by 1521 and same with 1540 and 1541.
For a simple NAS, what should I aim at? A 1508, 1518 or 1521?
As a FYI - Xeon D does not have an onboard QAT engine like the C27x8 chips.For a simple NAS, I would say that it would not matter which one you get -- take the cheapest. Depending on how simple NAS you want, I'm not even sure you need a Xeon D at all. In my case, I am going for 1528 because it will be used as a router and firewall, where the extra networking performance would come to good use. Especially when PfSense 3.0 comes out with support for Intel DPDK (afaik only available on 15x8 as well).
Are you sure that applies to the 15x8 variants? In the table I linked earlier the network focused Xeon Ds' have QuickAssist checked. Are there any limitations here? Just realised that the check is just a "v", which could mean that it does not have full support... Can you clarify?As a FYI - Xeon D does not have an onboard QAT engine like the C27x8 chips.
You need a Quick Assist card ($650-700) with the Xeon D-15x8Are you sure that applies to the 15x8 variants? In the table I linked earlier the network focused Xeon Ds' have QuickAssist checked. Are there any limitations here? Just realised that the check is just a "v", which could mean that it does not have full support... Can you clarify?
That seems pretty hot but you do have a few more cores than I have. . I was doing some initial tests on my 1557 SMX10SDV-12C-TLN4F system, idle temps of 48-51C and max temp of 86C. That max was after running a Wk12VM with 12 cores running intelburn for 45min. The system is in a 2U ARK IPC-2U235 chassis with 3x 60mm Noctua fans an the standard 5v case fan mounted on the heatsink.Hey guys, just got my 1587 board up and running with some nvme storage (awesome). But the cpu is running at 104 degress celcius. What temperatures are you getting? This is with 50% load on cpu nonstop. What is the temp range for that motherboard? Supermicro X10SDV-16C-TLN4F.