Monero Mining Performance

[funkywizard]

E5 v2 H/s per watt is pretty good and H/s per dollar value is better than E5 v3.
For E5 v2 , we don't need to invest in higher cost DDR4 ram and new system board.

I like E5 v2 CPU. Just hoping price starting dropping soon.

From my perspective, if it were any cheaper it would be free. They've come down A LOT recently. Buy it now on the 2660v2 is ballpark $130, 2680v2 is only a little over $200. Best offers can bring that down a little. The v1's have actually gone up in price lately, so the gap is very narrow.

Don't forget that v2's are needed for pcie 3.0 in many cases. Between the power efficiency and the performance improvements, for me it's a no brainer. Some boards only take v1's, for everything else I'll be using v2's from here forwards.

 

[nthu9280]

@funkywizard
Are you getting ~1180h/s on 2xe5-2660v2? The best I have seen is around 1000 with Xmr-stak-cpu.

NM. I can't read or not enough coffee
Saw those are for 2680 v2

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

[spfoo]

great results : )

anyway, I'm happy to accept (at least for this chassis + motherboard) the ipmitool watt readings are not erroneously low.

so... 989 / 133 = 7.4 H/W pretty good

Impressive numbers. I don't think it's possible to get anywhere near those numbers with AMD Opterons. Mostly due to fact that the down core function on AMD seems to cut access to the cache on the cores that are off.

 

[bash]

@Robert Q - we do have the 7351 in house, but only a single version. We are supposed to be getting a UP system or two in the very near future to help get more EPYC systems online.

On the Atom side, that is the correct question Have not gotten my hands on an 8 core model yet.

Just curious if you guys have benched the 7351 yet? Do you have plans on testing it in a dual socket setup?

 

[Patrick]

EPYC 7401 ended up just shy of 1600H/s at 210W

@bash for Monero or in general? You can get a decent idea of performance (non-Monero) via the 7301 Intel Xeon Silver 4114 Linux Benchmarks and Review

7351P numbers will be out very soon. Cache size difference is the big story between the 7301 and the 7351. The P allows slightly more power for CPU since there are the dual-socket IF components not active, but we have been told that it should be a minimal impact. Unfortunately, we do not have the non-P parts to do dual socket for these. We have 2x 7251, 2x 7281 and (more than) 2x 7601.

 

[Grushz]

I have some question. I'm newbie mine XMR. In situation 2 * Xeon E5-2699 v4 mine in minergate hashspeed are 280 H/s but Xeon E5-2699 V4 are 88 Thread. What are true hashspeed between is 280*88 or 280 H/s. And Hash power of Xeon E5-4699 V4 ?

 

[Klee]

I have some question. I'm newbie mine XMR. In situation 2 * Xeon E5-2699 v4 mine in minergate hashspeed are 280 H/s but Xeon E5-2699 V4 are 88 Thread. What are true hashspeed between is 280*88 or 280 H/s. And Hash power of Xeon E5-4699 V4 ?

Do not use Minergate!! If you have any invalid shares they will penalize you severely!!

Use xmr-stack-cpu, wolfs, xmrig or any other miner program than minergate and any other pool than minergate.

 

[Patrick]

Seems very low:

ubuntu@asuse52699v4:~$ docker logs 15e | tail -n 20
[2017-09-23 15:22:29] accepted: 44766/44766 (100.00%), 1681.17 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:22:38] Stratum detected new block
[2017-09-23 15:23:33] accepted: 44767/44767 (100.00%), 1714.24 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:24:56] accepted: 44768/44768 (100.00%), 1711.02 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:26:36] Stratum detected new block
[2017-09-23 15:27:08] Stratum detected new block
[2017-09-23 15:27:09] accepted: 44769/44769 (100.00%), 1696.13 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:27:10] accepted: 44770/44770 (100.00%), 1706.15 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:27:21] accepted: 44771/44771 (100.00%), 1702.15 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:27:28] accepted: 44772/44772 (100.00%), 1701.81 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:28:41] accepted: 44773/44773 (100.00%), 1695.92 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:28:53] accepted: 44774/44774 (100.00%), 1712.01 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:29:45] accepted: 44775/44775 (100.00%), 1642.29 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:29:48] accepted: 44776/44776 (100.00%), 1675.85 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:30:51] Stratum detected new block
[2017-09-23 15:31:32] accepted: 44777/44777 (100.00%), 1636.16 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)

 

[Grushz]

Do not use Minergate!! If you have any invalid shares they will penalize you severely!!

Use xmr-stack-cpu, wolfs, xmrig or any other miner program than minergate and any other pool than minergate.

Thank

 

[Grushz]

Seems very low:

ubuntu@asuse52699v4:~$ docker logs 15e | tail -n 20
[2017-09-23 15:22:29] accepted: 44766/44766 (100.00%), 1681.17 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:22:38] Stratum detected new block
[2017-09-23 15:23:33] accepted: 44767/44767 (100.00%), 1714.24 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:24:56] accepted: 44768/44768 (100.00%), 1711.02 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:26:36] Stratum detected new block
[2017-09-23 15:27:08] Stratum detected new block
[2017-09-23 15:27:09] accepted: 44769/44769 (100.00%), 1696.13 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:27:10] accepted: 44770/44770 (100.00%), 1706.15 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:27:21] accepted: 44771/44771 (100.00%), 1702.15 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:27:28] accepted: 44772/44772 (100.00%), 1701.81 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:28:41] accepted: 44773/44773 (100.00%), 1695.92 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:28:53] accepted: 44774/44774 (100.00%), 1712.01 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:29:45] accepted: 44775/44775 (100.00%), 1642.29 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:29:48] accepted: 44776/44776 (100.00%), 1675.85 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)
[2017-09-23 15:30:51] Stratum detected new block
[2017-09-23 15:31:32] accepted: 44777/44777 (100.00%), 1636.16 H/s at diff 100002 (yay!!!)

Oh. This Powerful. Estimate 1700 h/s. This hashrate calculate in "Mining Calculator Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dash and Monero" profit ~0.03458 XMR / Day are true ?

 

[Patrick]

It is probably about that.

 

[Grushz]

It is probably about that.

Thank ^^

 

[Patrick]

The first post now has a fun nugget: Every AMD EPYC 7000 series CPU in 1P configurations.

 

[Klee]

AMD Phenom 2 940 at 3.0 GH/z Black Edition with 3 threads does 55 H/s.

AMD FX 8320 at 4.0 GHz running on 4 cores, cores 1- 3- 5- 7, does 385 H/s at 204 w.

The FX cpu's have huge L2 caches and do not follow the 1 thread per 2 mb L3 rule. It has its own... 1 odd numbered thread per 2 mb L2.

One day i'll throw a Ubuntu hard drive in my daughters gaming pc again and underclock the FX cpu a little to see what it will do as far as H/s to Watts.

Once you start to overclock them the power goes WAY up with out a huge gain so I'm thinking underclocking it will allow the power to go way down without a big hit on hash rates.

385 H/s / 4 = 96.25 H/s per thread......the highest of any that I have ran.
Thats because its running in L2 cache which is much faster than L3.

FX 83xx specs:
Level 2 cache size 4 x 2 MB 16-way set associative shared exclusive caches
Level 3 cache size 8 MB 64-way set associative shared cache

 

[KorDen1977]

Hello!

I have i7-3820 3.60GHz, use in overclocking on air (130-131%) of 4.721GHz = 345-350 H/s (Xmr-stack-cpu Wolf v1.3.0-1.5.0).

What choice, i7-4960X 3.60GHz (L3 cache = 15Mb) or Xeon E5-2697 v2 2.70GHz (L3 cache = 30Mb), or alternative i7-4930K 3.40GHz option (L3 cache = 12Mb).

What from this it is better for LGA 2011?

I will also be able to overclocking i7-4960X - i7-4930K for 130-131% (on air), or on water (Fractal Design Celsius S36) even more...
Xeon E5 almost does not overclocking.

I have GPU NVIDIA GTX 1080 (MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SEA HAWK X - OS) = 770H/s (ccminer 2.2).

 

[nfsden]

I have GPU NVIDIA GTX 1080 (MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SEA HAWK X - OS) = 770H/s (ccminer 2.2).

There exists much more profitable altcoins for 1080ti!

 

[KorDen1977]

I am aware of it!
On it I use "NiceHash Miner Legacy v1.8.1.3" - with switched on almost all algorithms...
I get XMR only on CPU!

And now I plan to update the CPU on - i7-4960X 3.60GHz, or Xeon E5-2697 v2 2.70GHz, or i7-4930K 3.40GHz.
What from them it is better for XMR?

 

[Klee]

I am aware of it!
On it I use "NiceHash Miner Legacy v1.8.1.3" - with switched on almost all algorithms...
I get XMR only on CPU!

And now I plan to update the CPU on - i7-4960X 3.60GHz, or Xeon E5-2697 v2 2.70GHz, or i7-4930K 3.40GHz.
What from them it is better for XMR?

Xeon E5-2697 v2 because of the 30 mb L3 cache.

 

[hamster.theminer]

Hi all,
I wonder to know if someone has one of the following CPU in order to add it to the benchmark.
Core i9-7980XE
Core i9-7960X
Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7900X
Core i7-7820X
Thank you

 

[Patrick]

Hi all,
I wonder to know if someone has one of the following CPU in order to add it to the benchmark.
Core i9-7980XE
Core i9-7960X
Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7900X
Core i7-7820X
Thank you

Without benching, I can tell you AMD EPYC will be better performance per watt and dollar by a wide margin.