It comes with complete (inner and outer) rails. I didn't check for the model on the sticker, but for all intents and purposes it's an SC216E16-R1200LPB. 2 of the 3 systems included the air shroud which was a bonus.
Thank you, Aestr. This helps to know what's included.
I was in the market for a 2u 24 bay chassis myself. Originally wanted the super micro 216 but all the ones listed were with a EL1 expander. Essentially 1 8087 connection to drive all 24 disks (2 other ports in expander are failover/daisychain and don't add anything to bandwidth). With SSD's and 24 bays this is a big bottleneck. I wanted 6 dedicated 8087 ports (4 disks/port). Didn't see any of those worth mentioning however. So I ended up getting an equivalent Intel barebones instead.
EDIT: just realized the link in the OP was the 216 AMD server I saw a while back and was considering purchasing just for the chassis. Also saw another with a full Intel E5 build for $630 (think it was E5-2630's). Seemed like a good deal if you don't mind not getting an E5-2670.
JayG30, some great info here as I'm finally starting to get a handle on all the various configurations!
I wanted to add that intended usage of these chassis is required before making a proper decision on choosing between the Expander vs Non-Expander versions. For my usage, I'm going to be using this in my home office attached to a 846 chassis. The 286 chassis will be populated with SSD drives storing 1-2 VMs per drive for development, whereas the 846 chassis will be populated with Spinner drives for storing media/files (Pictures, Movies, Audio, VM backups, Development files etc). At any one time, I doubt I would be running more than 5-6 of the VM's (I can only program against so many servers!), and there's no way that the host SSDs would all be running at full bandwidth.
Importantly, the simplicity of cabling these chassis in a cascading configuration along with the lower cost (fewer HBA & cables) makes the expander version a better choice for my needs. I also like the fact that I have another Expander chassis in case I decide to change my 846 chassis down the road to something bigger that might not have this feature.
I might be missing something here, but it sounds like the 216A version is meant for those who are running a fully loaded 216 chassis and expect full bandwidth to each drive. This scenario probably means hosting or corporate usage for most cases (either live or home lab testing), or maybe those scenarios where people are using this as a low cost 12G system.
I'd love to hear any other scenarios that I haven't heard or thought about.