Recent content by g0dM@n

This is valuable info. I just want to know how to bypass in case I "permanently lost my domain" -- Of course I have a means to prevent that, but I always assume the worst. I'd hate to lose access to all data just b/c of the domain being gone. I'll keep this in my back pocket. And no I don't...

Yeah, well it's a home setup, so running two domain controllers on the same server/storage may not do me much good anyway. I had Veeam backups to a separate NAS and recovered it, but was hoping there's a way for me to create a local account in Napp-IT that can be used to map to the SMB root...

My domain controller went down, long story. I'm in the middle of recovering it, but I hate how complete access to my ZFS shares over napp-it is a dud. I have the napp-it root and admin passwords, obviously... I was hoping that the root account could map the SMB share somehow, but I couldn't...

It doesn't work. It gives me a parsing error I've tried that command even with vers=1.0 and it doesn't work. I have to put it in this format: //192.168.xx.xxx/shares/xxxxxx /media/xxxxxx/ cifs vers=1.0,credentials=/home/username/.plexcreds,iocharset=utf8,sec=ntlm 0 0 The above works like a...

Thanks! Do you think this is my likely problem with Ubuntu only being able to mount if I use smb v1.0? Just change minimum to 3.0 and try again? I've no idea what else this could mess with.

Thank you. My issue is that ubuntu would not mount unless I specified as SMB v1.0. I'm not sure if napp-it is only allowing 1.0 or I'm doing something wrong through Ubuntu. When I tried v3.0 via automount and then test with "sudo mount -a" it only works if I put v1.0 in the code, as such in...

Alright, I'm 95% complete with this rehaul! Two more things to complete. I haven't touched SMTP alerting just yet, but I did get my snapshot and scrub schedules all done up. Got my Veeam backups going for all of my VMs to my napp-it repo too. Assuming the SMTP info you gave above works, this...

That's good to know. Thanks, bud.

OK no SLOG then. That's good to know and makes sense. I'm throwing my VMs on an NVMe on PCIe right now and backing it up with Veeam to a ZFS share. Napp-it is also on that NVMe, so I may move it off to a SSD... I'm guessing napp-it doesn't need to be on NVMe, so putting it on SSD it can be...

As far as I can tell, everything else seems to be performing fine, so I've no idea what this is about. Should I look around for broken SIDs on my shares? I had done a huge cleanup, but you never know... All I did was map a domain admin to the root user as seen below. I used the equals symbol...

Sorry, silly me I thought I had quoted "nle" from page 1, post #5. This is what I've been getting:

I'm running a fresh install of r151038 and napp-it (installed a few days ago) and seeing this in console, though everything performing great. I only have one user mapping of domain admin to root.

Thanks for the info. I'll try SMTP when I get a chance. I'm migrating another pool via robocopy for various reasons. Combining two old ZFS pools into one larger one. I have plenty of space right now. How do you have ZFS use RAM for caching? I can throw a ton of RAM at this guy if I wanted to...

I finally figured out the permissions issue and got my shares back online!! When I first built napp-it I didn't have a windows domain, so I created accounts in napp-it, made matching local accounts in windows (username and password match perfectly, yes cases must match as ZFS required that -- I...

Sick of the issue above, so I built a new napp-it from scratch, no AIO. Installed OmniOS r151038 and ran the napp-it install from there. I imported my original pool and see all data and disks, but I am having the issue I tried so hard to not have to deal with... that damn guest account is using...