Actually, I lost interest with you too. Everyone knows what "part of" means, and where the "other parts" are. OSPRAY, which is completely written by intel, has no bias against other CPUs. I can't possibly test every single thing written by intel, and people can always post counter proofs. I'll gladly change my mind if someone does.
But you don't care. You only misinterpret my ideas, and accuse me "cherry picking" without even mentioning where did I pick from. You could just be a little bit reasonable, and actually prove your point with just any counter proof that shows otherwise. And I welcome that, it's all good conversation that widen the eye of everyone.
But do we see any proof from you? No, not a single one.
You want others to be absolutely rigorous, but you didn't even try to be rigorous.
I never said using a certain benchmark, or buying a certain brand, is intolerable, in fact I stated multiple times that I disagree with these ideas. But you want others to believe that I think this way. Can I say my worst interpretation is, you want to show others that I'm not thinking with logic?
Restatement: Boasting Cinebench and CPUZ benchmarks, along with using only CSGO as the representation of all games, are two of the common patterns seen in those fanboy/paid reviews, videos and posts.
In fact, I'm beginning to doubt your developer status. Every other developer I know are humble, friendly and most importantly, never insult people just because they feel like it. They don't just elaborate on some imperfections which strictly isn't wrong, and start roasting people.
Currently I'm working on fixing my broken VS that won't uninstall. After I finished with the setup, I will compile X265 with both MSVC and ICC, and test them again on one of my friend's AMD system without asm option. I do agree that just testing the performance differences outside the core assembly isn't ideal, and your suggestion is constructive. How can I "cherry pick" if I do every test in question that people pointed out. But this will probably be the last thing I do for you.
Yeah, because speaking sharp truth is bad, ill-intended, you think. But I disagree. I also disagree that people can just say anything without proof.
Now that I know I don't need to deal with the fans in STH, I'll never bring up this topic again after this one is done, unless fanboys start invading.
But you don't care. You only misinterpret my ideas, and accuse me "cherry picking" without even mentioning where did I pick from. You could just be a little bit reasonable, and actually prove your point with just any counter proof that shows otherwise. And I welcome that, it's all good conversation that widen the eye of everyone.
But do we see any proof from you? No, not a single one.
You want others to be absolutely rigorous, but you didn't even try to be rigorous.
I never said using a certain benchmark, or buying a certain brand, is intolerable, in fact I stated multiple times that I disagree with these ideas. But you want others to believe that I think this way. Can I say my worst interpretation is, you want to show others that I'm not thinking with logic?
Restatement: Boasting Cinebench and CPUZ benchmarks, along with using only CSGO as the representation of all games, are two of the common patterns seen in those fanboy/paid reviews, videos and posts.
In fact, I'm beginning to doubt your developer status. Every other developer I know are humble, friendly and most importantly, never insult people just because they feel like it. They don't just elaborate on some imperfections which strictly isn't wrong, and start roasting people.
Currently I'm working on fixing my broken VS that won't uninstall. After I finished with the setup, I will compile X265 with both MSVC and ICC, and test them again on one of my friend's AMD system without asm option. I do agree that just testing the performance differences outside the core assembly isn't ideal, and your suggestion is constructive. How can I "cherry pick" if I do every test in question that people pointed out. But this will probably be the last thing I do for you.
Yeah, because speaking sharp truth is bad, ill-intended, you think. But I disagree. I also disagree that people can just say anything without proof.
Now that I know I don't need to deal with the fans in STH, I'll never bring up this topic again after this one is done, unless fanboys start invading.
Last edited: