which is pointing toward what I said earlier: it's getting very hard to put together a system that can beat 1950x for much cheaper...Passmark leads me to believe otherwise.
which is pointing toward what I said earlier: it's getting very hard to put together a system that can beat 1950x for much cheaper...Passmark leads me to believe otherwise.
There's a lot of benchmarks on them already..Any gentle soul capable of making the good old cinebench 15 benchmark on these puppies?
the cinebench scores are not available for the cpu you looking for?I'm sorry, but i don't think you understand, geekbench and "userbenchmark" are not cinebench 15 are they?
We been talking about about other CPU. Which CPU are you referring to?Any gentle soul capable of making the good old cinebench 15 benchmark on these puppies?
It's diffrent with these chips.it won't .. all cores usage turbo is 3.1 max. 3.5 only for up to 2 core use. see the multipliers here:
List of Intel Xeon microprocessors - Wikipedia
Care to tell us? Lots of articles on Google for that search from videos to in-depth other cpu with mentions of them....It's diffrent with these chips.
Try searching for 2683 v3 all core turbo on Google. These v3 chips are pretty funky.
what MB you got? We just eliminate intel S2600 from consideration.Send me your 2696s
64GB ECC DDR4 + 1950X + motherboard + cooler is more than I want to spend. The 2696 I think will be good.
X9DAEwhat MB you got? We just eliminate intel S2600 from consideration.
That cinebench vid is for dual 2683 v3 (28 x 2.5 = 70) , not 2686 v3 (36 x 2.3 = 82). I would expect 3700 or better with dual 2686 v3The numbers don't scale like that.
2x2686V3 scores a 3168. For the parts needed to run it. Is it even worth it? Why not just go with TR?
For a new system, the value is unbeatable for multithread at this point. For old hardware system, dual 2696 v2 gives better value since you could get a lot more ddr3 for the money right now. but 2011 is pretty much at the end point as 2696 v2 is the last cpu for 2011 that you can go to.all this comparison really puts into perspective the value the 1950x brings to the table.
A Google search for dual CPU setups on the CPU-Z Validator website showsfor dual cpu?