Hello!
I have been reading about ZFS in and out for about a year and I am getting ready to setup my first test storage server!
I am eventually going to be setting up a storage server for my small business that will serve data to a hypervisor (haven't really decided yet but I am teetering to the side of Proxmox rather than ESXi 5.1)
I was reading this document and I am now a little confused. I know that this document is for assisting IT sysadmins in an enterprise environment but I some questions...
I was originally thinking of creating a root pool for the OS and a tank pool to serve to the hypervisor to store the virtual machines; however, the Oracle document suggests creating separate pools for windows and linux virtual machines.
Why is that?
Why not create a single pool for both Windows and Linux VMs?
At this time, I think that they did this because having 24 servers-worth of read/write requests going through a single pool would degrade performance for all servers that are making those requests. If this is the case, why not separate them further into more pools?
Ideally, wouldn't it be best to segregate servers based on how much read/write requests each server makes?
I feel like I am overthinking this hahaha.
I have been reading about ZFS in and out for about a year and I am getting ready to setup my first test storage server!
I am eventually going to be setting up a storage server for my small business that will serve data to a hypervisor (haven't really decided yet but I am teetering to the side of Proxmox rather than ESXi 5.1)
I was reading this document and I am now a little confused. I know that this document is for assisting IT sysadmins in an enterprise environment but I some questions...
I was originally thinking of creating a root pool for the OS and a tank pool to serve to the hypervisor to store the virtual machines; however, the Oracle document suggests creating separate pools for windows and linux virtual machines.
Why is that?
Why not create a single pool for both Windows and Linux VMs?
At this time, I think that they did this because having 24 servers-worth of read/write requests going through a single pool would degrade performance for all servers that are making those requests. If this is the case, why not separate them further into more pools?
Ideally, wouldn't it be best to segregate servers based on how much read/write requests each server makes?
I feel like I am overthinking this hahaha.