Honestly I did a benchmark with raid-10 since I don't use the others much - and there was very little difference between the p400/p410/p420.
P400=ddr/pci-e 1.0 and LSI 1068e
P410=ddr2/pci-e 2.0 - pac sierra (flash back write cache option!)
P420=ddr3/pci-e 3.0 - pmc-adaptec (flash back write cache! hp smart path[fastpath], hp smartcache [cachecade 1])
Folks just don't understand hardware, and when they don't understand it , it becomes junk. So they spend money on M1015 and PERC 5/i when they could have gotten a much sweeter deal on a P400
I have no doubt that the cards scale better with other raid scenario's but with plain old drives, without ssd caching, the limits of the drives present far before the limits of the controller.
What counts to me is reliability first. I'll take 1.5GB sata - how many SATA hard drives really sustain that rate?
What i've learned over the years, skip sata for chrissake. Stick to SAS , it is so far superior it is not funny.