Interesting Windows Server 2012 LSI SAS2308 Controller Results

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
Working on the first five drive benchmarks for this week. Seeing some really interesting things testing on the LSI SAS2308. Drives are seeing low performance. Pretty darn cool to see this kind of result.

Each drive is hanging off of the IR mode LSI SAS2308 but is not part of a RAID group. Basically they just show up in Storage Manager as single drives. OK. Driver version is 2.0.55.84. How bad? Here are a few results:

SanDisk Extreme 240GB


Samsung 840 Pro 256GB


OCZ Vertex 4 256GB


Yea... that bad. Trying the LSI SAS 2308 LSI driver off of the Supermicro ftp v2.00.58

Stay tuned... If anyone else has thoughts on the write performance, let me know. A bit tired today so certainly not thinking on top of my game right now.

UPDATE: Seems like the same performance with the Supermicro LSI drivers. 1689 total score for example with the SanDisk Extreme 240GB.
 

mobilenvidia

Moderator
Sep 25, 2011
1,956
212
63
New Zealand
Disk Cache off ?
Rebooting after doing anything to drives ?

Driver will have little effect on the results I would think, something is majorly wrong with the writes
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
I think it is IR mode vs IT mode. Trying to flash. sas2flsh.exe is giving me the PAL error. Trying to go uefi but USB drive is mapped as a blk7 instead of fs0... not sure why. Can change to the blkX devices but not able to cd into the directory. Even tried using the DOS LiveCD.
 

mobilenvidia

Moderator
Sep 25, 2011
1,956
212
63
New Zealand
Shouldn't make any difference really IR or IT mode, just make the drive 'Unconfigured Good'
I get very little difference between the 2 modes.
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
Shouldn't make any difference really IR or IT mode, just make the drive 'Unconfigured Good'
I get very little difference between the 2 modes.
I just want to try this... megarec cannot find the controller... sas2flsh can find it but PAL error. Argh.

Need USB to work in UEFI so I can try that and get around PAL.
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
Crossing fingers... USB drive #6 worked (Micro SDHC card -> SD -> USB adapter)

sas2flash.efi -o -e 6 worked
sas2flash.efi -o -f 9207-8.bin worked
sas2flash.efi -o -b mptsas2.rom worked

... here we go
 

mobilenvidia

Moderator
Sep 25, 2011
1,956
212
63
New Zealand
Crossing fingers... USB drive #6 worked (Micro SDHC card -> SD -> USB adapter)

sas2flash.efi -o -e 6 worked
sas2flash.efi -o -f 9207-8.bin worked
sas2flash.efi -o -b mptsas2.rom worked

... here we go
Don't need the mptAS2.rom in IT mode, as it's the BIOS which you try and get away from in IT mode :)
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
Good point. Was just playing around though.

So interesting note... post flash... 1794.54 Total for the SanDisk Extreme 240GB.
 

mobilenvidia

Moderator
Sep 25, 2011
1,956
212
63
New Zealand
Also just found in Device manager:

Write Cache off, Write cache flushing on (unticked) = Fast writes
Write Cache on, Write cache flushing on (unticked) = Poor writes
Write Cache on, Write cache flushing off (ticked) = fast writes

So good to have UEFI boots in to Win8, quick turn arounds in testing :)
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
Looks like unticked-unticked did better. Surprisingly, still not as fast as the Intel controller results. I was hoping with a fast processor and a PCIe 3.0 x8 connection, these would go fast.
 

mobilenvidia

Moderator
Sep 25, 2011
1,956
212
63
New Zealand
My vernerable Async Solid 3 gets better write results on the M1015 in IR mode.

Something is afoot.

Writecache on, Buffer flush on (unticked)


Writecache on Buffer flush off (both ticked)
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
Not totally sold on this. The Samsung 830 and 840 Pro 256GB drives are failing to hit 10MB/s at 4K QD4 and both have write scores sub 500.
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
WHOA! The plot thickens Pieter... that trick only works for SandForce SSDs. Vertex 4 and Samsung drives to not benefit from deselecting that box.
 

mobilenvidia

Moderator
Sep 25, 2011
1,956
212
63
New Zealand
The same old venerable Single solid 3 on the IBM M5016 in single RAID0.
Now has same performance as Samsung 840 Pro with reads :)
What would the 840 Pro do on SAS2208 controller ?
 

dba

Moderator
Feb 20, 2012
1,477
184
63
San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Working on the first five drive benchmarks for this week. Seeing some really interesting things testing on the LSI SAS2308. Drives are seeing low performance. Pretty darn cool to see this kind of result.

...
Hi Patrick,

Something is definitely wrong. I'd try a different benchmark tool - probably my old standby IOMeter - to see if the results are consistent across tools before diving in to other diagnostics.
 
Last edited:

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,805
113
Hi Patrick,

Something is definitely wrong. I'd try a different benchmark tool - probably my old standby IOMeter - to see if the results are consistent across tools before diving in to other diagnostics.
Just tried AS SSD after installing .NET framework 3.5. Same result on the Samsung 830 and 840 Pro. 2.2MB/s 4K writes.

Also... I tried a Vertex 1 128GB. 12MB/s 4K writes on the LSI controller. Wonder if it is something Samsung related?